4 Mins
What accountants and lawyers should watch for
The collapse of a company does not necessarily mean the end of the underlying business. In many cases, the assets or operations of an insolvent company may be transferred to a new entity and continue trading.
This is often referred to as “phoenix activity”. A business rising from the ashes of a failed company.
Importantly, this type of business rescue is not automatically improper. In fact, when handled correctly, it can preserve jobs, maintain customer relationships and maximise value for creditors.
However, regulators are increasingly focused on situations where phoenix arrangements appear to be used to avoid debts, particularly tax liabilities. The challenge for directors and their advisers is understanding when legitimate restructuring crosses the line into misconduct.
Legitimate business rescue
There are many circumstances in which a phoenix-style restructuring may be entirely appropriate.
For example, where a company is burdened by historic debt but the underlying business remains viable, a sale of the business or its assets to a new company may provide a better outcome than a simple liquidation.
This can occur through a formal insolvency process such as administration, where an insolvency practitioner oversees the sale and ensures that assets are marketed and sold at an appropriate value.
Where conducted transparently and in the interests of creditors, these transactions can represent a legitimate rescue of a viable business.
Where problems arise
Concerns arise where directors appear to deliberately shed liabilities while continuing essentially the same business through a new company.
Regulators, particularly the Insolvency Service and HMRC, are paying increasing attention to situations where companies enter liquidation with significant debts while a similar business quickly appears under the control of the same individuals.
While every case is fact-specific, certain patterns tend to raise questions.
Warning signs advisers may encounter
Professional advisers sometimes encounter situations where:
- A new company is established shortly before or after the liquidation of an existing business
- The same directors or management team continue running the new entity
- The business trades from the same premises, using the same staff and customer base
- Significant tax liabilities have accumulated in the failed company
- Company assets appear to have been transferred to the new entity at little or no value
These circumstances do not automatically mean wrongdoing has occurred, but they may attract scrutiny if creditors appear to have been disadvantaged.
The legal framework
UK law contains several provisions intended to prevent abuse of phoenix arrangements.
For example, section 216 of the Insolvency Act 1986 restricts directors of liquidated companies from reusing the same or similar company name within five years of liquidation unless specific procedures are followed.
This rule is designed to prevent situations where creditors and customers are misled into believing they are dealing with the original company.
More broadly, the conduct of directors in the period leading up to insolvency is reviewed by insolvency practitioners and reported to the Insolvency Service. Where misconduct is identified, this may lead to director disqualification proceedings.
Personal consequences for directors
If misconduct is established, the consequences can be significant.
Director disqualification orders can prevent individuals from acting as directors or being involved in the management of companies for periods of up to fifteen years.
In some cases, directors may also face financial consequences, including compensation orders requiring them to contribute towards creditor losses.
These risks are one reason why it is important for directors to obtain advice before taking steps that could later be interpreted as an attempt to avoid liabilities.
The role of early professional advice
Many problematic situations arise not because directors intend to act improperly, but because they misunderstand the legal framework around insolvency and restructuring.
Accountants and lawyers are often the first professionals to become aware that a client is considering closing one company and continuing the business through another.
Where this occurs, early engagement with an insolvency practitioner can help ensure that any restructuring is conducted transparently and in accordance with the relevant legal requirements.
Handled properly, restructuring can preserve value and deliver better outcomes for creditors. However, where the process is poorly structured or undertaken without advice, it may expose directors to unnecessary regulatory risk.
Recognising the difference between legitimate business rescue and problematic phoenix activity is therefore an increasingly important issue for professional advisers and directors alike.
Get in touch
Last Updated on 30 March 2026