3 Mins
We’ve released a new survey report highlighting that while a majority of Scottish law firms have yet to adopt AI-based tools, there is a clear shift underway as firms begin to explore their potential.
The findings from our ‘AI in the Scottish Legal Profession’ study show that over 60% of respondents’ firms are not currently using AI, but many indicated they expect to trial or adopt AI tools in the near future. Despite growing awareness, only 4% of respondents reported using AI regularly, suggesting the sector is still in the early stages of adoption.
The survey revealed strong concerns about AI’s role in legal decision-making, with 96% of respondents expressing some level of concern about potential bias in AI tools. However, more than one in four respondents said they were comfortable using AI to assist in legal decisions, indicating a balancing act between caution and competitiveness, and a desire not to fall behind.
Our forensic accounting director, Christine Rolland, said:
“There’s clear interest in the possibilities AI offers the legal profession, but also understandable hesitation. A common thread is that legal professionals see the potential of AI but lack a clear understanding of how it works or what it can be trusted to do.”
“Concerns about data privacy, ethical risks, and over-reliance on ‘black box’ systems remain persistent barriers. What we’re seeing is a sector that knows change is coming and wants to be ready for it, but needs the right support, education, and reassurance before fully embracing AI.”
Among firms already using AI, the most commonly reported benefit was faster legal research (53%), followed by improved marketing ideas (32%) and reduced workloads (26%). More advanced applications, such as document and case data analysis, remain underused, with over half of the respondents having yet to explore this area. Of those who have, 16% reported significant improvements and 21% saw slight gains.
When asked about overall efficiency, 58% of respondents reported slight improvements from AI, while 42% saw no change. These mixed results suggest that many firms are still working out how to effectively integrate AI tools into their workflows, or haven’t found the right application yet.
The survey found that legal professionals see strong potential for AI to enhance core areas of legal training, with 68% identifying legal research skills as the top candidate for AI-assisted learning. Drafting legal documents (54%) and case law analysis (50%) also ranked highly, pointing to AI’s value in developing key practical skills. There was also notable interest in personalised study plans (43%), reflecting demand for more adaptive, tailored learning. However, areas like courtroom simulation (14%) and ethical decision-making (11%) were seen as less suitable for AI, likely due to their reliance on human judgment and interaction.
Overall, respondents view AI as a tool best suited to boosting analytical and preparatory skills in legal education. For now, the way forward is education, experimentation, and ethical oversight. Firms that invest early in understanding AI, not just using it, may be the ones best positioned when the technology finally becomes a standard part of legal work.